SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (59093)11/4/2000 6:20:45 PM
From: iandiareii  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
BUSH LIED THREE MORE TIMES ON THURSDAY NIGHT

Click here for document: geocities.com

Docket #76/7-02342 [is] an official record of George W. Bush's legal activities that followed from his DWI arrest in 9/4/76. (Posted at CNN.) Below are excerpts from his 11/2/00 press conference in which he admitted that reports eralier in the evening were correct. As you can see, Bush lied three times, if the docket record is to be believed. He implied that he paid the fine at the police station. The docket record says he paid the fine over a month later, on 10/15/76. He said that there were no legal proceedings of an kind, but the docket says he was scheduled for hearings on 9/16/76 and 10/15/76 and was given two continuances along the way, one to 9/30/76, the other to 10/25/76. The 10/15/76 hearing coincides with the date the fine was paid . He said there was no court hearing. The docket record indicates two hearing dates. He said neither he nor his family took any action after that night. Action of some sort had to be taken with respect to the continuances, the hearings, the paying of the fine, and the return of the $500 bond which one supposes must have been provided so Bush would not have to spend time in jail. Even if Poppy simply cut Junior off, which is unlikely, Bush or a legal representative must have been required to attend the hearing , pay the fine, and have the bond returned. Bush could probably provide some sort of explanation for all of these contradictions, but the fact is he didn't do so during his press conference. Reporters and viewers left the conference thinking that Bush was arrested and taken to the police station where he paid his fine and that was the end of the story, because that's what Bush said or implied. Bush lied.--Politex, 11/4/00

Bush: There's a report out tonight that 24 years ago I was apprehended in Kennebunkport, Maine, for a DUI. That's an accurate story. ...I was pulled over. I admitted to the policeman that I had been drinking. I paid a fine....
Reporter: Could you tell us some more about the night that you spent some time in jail? Did you --
Bush: No, I didn't spend any night in jail there. I did not spend ....
[inaudible question from a reporter]
Bush: No, none at all. None whatsoever. As a matter of fact, I, you know, I tried -- I mean, I -- listen, I told the guy I had been drinking and what do I need to do? And he said, "Here's the fine." I paid the fine and did my duty....
Reporter: Governor, was there any legal proceeding of any kind? Or did you just --
Bush: No. I pled -- you know, I said I was wrong and I ...
Reporter: In court?
Bush: No, there was no court. I went to the police station. I said, "I'm wrong."
Reporter: So you just had a [inaudible]?
Bush: Yes.
Reporter: For the same night.
Bush: Yes, I did....
Reporter: Is there any action that you or your family took after that night?
Bush: No, there's not. I mean, none.



To: jlallen who wrote (59093)11/4/2000 6:34:07 PM
From: iandiareii  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
BUSH LIES PILE UP AS NEW FACTS ARE UNEARTHED

According to a story in the Boston Globe this morning, a Maine man said he was in court in 1976 when George W. Bush was present to answer to his DWI charge. This confirms our assertion (see next story) that, based on the docket records, Bush lied at his press conference Thursday evening when he indicated that his DWI charge was taken care of on the evening it happened and that he never appeared in court. Further, Boston Globe reporters Stephen A. Kurkjian and David Armstrong imply that Bush lied another time when he participated in a hearing with Maine officials in a successful attempt to regain his right to drive in Maine, two years after the DWI infraction. Bush's "comments, made in a 1978 hearing conducted by telephone, clash with the presidential candidate's more recent recountings of his drinking habits at that time in his life." Another point made in the story continues to baffle us. People who lived in Maine in the '70's indicate that Bush's infraction would not have been taken as seriously then as it would be taken today. Having said that, why was Bush given such a lengthy suspension of his license for a fist-time DWI. Even today, a first-time DWI only merits a 90-day suspension. Also, in 1976 would a first-time DWI be forced to complete a driver rehabilitation course prior to having his suspension lifted? Nothing in Maine's 1997 laws indicates such a requirement. Excerpts from their story follow. --Politex, 11/4/00

"Bush confirmed Thursday that he was arrested in Kennebunkport, Maine, following a night of drinking with three friends and his sister Dorothy. Bush, who was 30 at the time, pleaded guilty, paid a $150 fine, and had his right to drive suspended.... The 1978 reinstatement hearing took place after Bush, in a handwritten letter to state authorities, said he was unable to complete a required driver rehabilitation course because he lived in Texas. In the letter, he said he hoped to be able to drive again in Maine as a ''tourist.'' Maine regulations allowed for him to be reinstated without taking the course, but doubled the length of time he had to wait before seeking to restore his right to drive....

"In a plea to win back his right to drive in Maine following his 1976 conviction for drunken driving, George W. Bush portrayed himself as a casual drinker, saying he drank ''infrequently'' and had an ''occasional beer,'' according to an official handwritten notation in Maine state records. His comments, made in a 1978 hearing conducted by telephone, clash with the presidential candidate's more recent recountings of his drinking habits at that time in his life. Bush said he stopped drinking in 1986 and has not had any alcohol since. But he has acknowledged a hard-drinking past that came to interfere with his life, though he has not been specific about how often he drank. His comments in the 1978 hearing cast his consumption of alcohol in the softest of terms. Notes from the hearing officer, included in records released by the state to the Globe, note that Bush said he drank about once a month and ''infrequently.'' The hearing officer, David Schulz, also noted that Bush said he drank an ''occasional beer.'' Following the hearing, Bush's right to drive in Maine was reinstated. In various interviews, Bush has said he stopped drinking when he turned 40 and realized the toll alcohol was taking on his life. In September, he said ''alcohol was beginning to compete for my affections for my wife and my family.'' In another interview with the Washington Post, Bush gave the following answer when asked if he had ever participated in Alcoholics Anonymous: ''I didn't ... I don't think I was clinically an alcoholic; I didn't have the genuine addiction. I don't know why I drank. I liked to drink, I guess.'' The Bush campaign yesterday did not respond to a request to reconcile such remarks with the self-description Bush offered the state hearing officer in 1978.....

"It began Thursday morning when a Maine man, who said he had been in Biddeford District Court on the same day in 1976 that Bush appeared to answer to the drunken driving charge, remarked to his chiropractor that he didn't understand how the arrest escaped attention by the media. Until Thursday, there had been only one other request for Bush's driving record in Maine, said Wyke, the Maine official. That request, made Oct. 23 by a man with a Phoenix address, asked for a copy of Bush's record during the past 10 years. Because the drunken driving arrest dated back more than two decades, the man was told the Texas governor's record was spotless. Many media outlets had requested copies of Bush's Texas driving records before Thursday, but because the charge in Maine was more than 10 years old, it would not have shown up on the Texas files, said a spokesman for the Texas Department of Public Safety. And in Maine, driving under the influence at that time was considered a type of traffic offense, said Mark Lavoie, president of the Maine State Bar Association. ''It was worse than a speeding ticket certainly, but far less than what it is today,'' he said. William Head, an attorney who wrote a book on drunken driving defense strategies, said the era in which Bush was arrested could have made it easier for him to avoid the conviction."

geocities.com



To: jlallen who wrote (59093)11/4/2000 6:35:17 PM
From: brutusdog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
He could have easily corrected any error. It is a lie.