SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : MOLEGATE! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (1655)11/5/2000 11:17:14 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 1719
 
I hate to say it, but I think Clinton is right on this one. We don't need an Official Secrets Act.

I don't think he's interested in the free flow of information, though. Journalists were against this, and vetoing it keeps him on the good side of the NY Times.



To: KLP who wrote (1655)11/5/2000 12:06:12 PM
From: John Lacelle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1719
 
Klp,

Clinton sure does some strange things. On the one
hand, he likes to protect those who leak US secrets
such as good old Wen Ho Lee, who leaked all of our
nuclear weapons data to China. But also, Clinton
signed the "Terrorism Act" which greatly expanded
the ability of the FBI and CIA to spy on US soil.

I just don't get Clinton.

-John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News