SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: surfbaron who wrote (11765)11/5/2000 11:31:17 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
You've misread bland's post. Bland was quoting another poster--tonytechcomm of Yahoo. In fact, bland agrees with Voltaire's last statement, which was quite profound really, that the psychologically brighter of the two candidates will win. Both Voltaire and tonytech have exactly nailed Gore's fatal flaw: he is much too smart for the rest of us...he's unquestionably convinced of it.

Bland's own thoughts on reading Voltaire's comments were that Reagan was probably hands down psychologically the brightest president of the past half century. Voltaire (whether he agrees with bland on that particular score or not)has introduced a crucial, crucial distinction--psychological intelligence IS far more important in a leadership position than IQ, GPA, academic achievement, etc. It's the intangibles, not the quantifiables, that make a man a leader and a winner. It's the qualities, not the quantities.

Bland, speaking for himself, is personally a Reagan man to the bone, so he understands your frustration on that score.



To: surfbaron who wrote (11765)11/5/2000 11:44:51 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
And actually, by sheerest coincidence, bland's "other self" on Yahoo is also a baron, much as you are:

messages.yahoo.com