Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: swisstrader who wrote (60475)	11/6/2000 10:48:13 AM
From: Life Coach	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

This was sent from Dick Hermann, a brilliant Washington lawyer/publisher who attended Yale with Bush: Dear Friends: I haven't said much during the presidential campaign season, but the time is getting short and I think I might regret not expressing myself on the matter of George W. Bush possibly being elected president. I went to school with George. In fact, I knew him quite well, both through athletics, socializing, joint classes, and particularly as my immediate lab partner in a Freshman science class. The fact that he is tantalizingly close to becoming the most powerful and important person in the world is both astonishing and terrifying. I had quite a number of classmates whom I thought might one day be worthy of, and competent to serve as, president, but George was most definitely not one of them. I did not come away from my four years of interaction with him with a very positive feeling about him. He was intellectually lazy, not particularly interested in anything serious, rather arrogant, contemptuous of studying, and purposeless. To think that someone so "average" could be leading this nation is a scary proposition. Sure, people change, but not that much. He would have to do a great deal more morphing in order to be up to the job to which he aspires. One of our fellow classmates advances the theory that George is so limited and narrow that he would have to surround himself with great advisors; hence, there is nothing to fear. I disagree. Ultimately, presidents have to make big decisions, and I worry about that. The prospect that our children might have to survive in a world heavily influenced by George should give anyone pause. One other point, one that has been made by others, but that I was witness to, "up close and personal:" George has NEVER been tested. He has lived a life of rare privilege, secure in his name and the largesse of the powerful and influential people who circle his family. No one ever had a safety net like George--whether it meant getting into Andover, Yale, Harvard Business School, the Air National Guard when (take it from me and the other 50-plus percent of my class that wound up on active duty after graduation) there were absolutely no Guard or Reserve slots available anywhere, the oil business, extricating himself from his oil company, the Texas Rangers, the gubernatorial nomination, and the presidential nomination--and few have taken more advantage of it. Like Ann Richards once said: "He was born on third base and thought he hit a triple." Please don't help him steal home. Dick Hermann

To: swisstrader who wrote (60475)	11/6/2000 11:28:39 AM
From: Joseph F. Hubel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Ok, I will concede to you. Dahmer murdered 12-16 people and Bush during his night on the town in a premeditated act killed 16,000. Dahmer was sentenced to death and Bush was fined $150. Very unfair and I certainly see your point. JFH

To: swisstrader who wrote (60475)	11/6/2000 11:45:28 AM
From: Proton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Re: Why I'm a Broken Glass Bush-backer There are a large number of people who view this election as an exercise in civic hygiene (a favorite phrase of George Will). The politics of personal destruction, as practiced by the Clintonistas over the past decade, have converted me from a lukewarm Bush partisan to a molten one. While this thread provides an environment rich with targets to prove my point, I'll focus on Herr Swisstrader's screed: ...and again, my point would be that both acts (DUI and serial killers) kill and maim people...in my eyes, the firecracker would be Dahmer, having killed only a handful of people and Bush would be the atomic bomb, in that DUI's kill thousands. This is a particularly slick (and sickening) form of character assassination. Has Bush killed anybody, let alone many children? Ma, non! But the poster hopes the faint scent of a murderer's odor hangs on the target. Bill, Hillary, Algore, Barbara, Rosie, and their ilk have made it abundantly clear that to disagree with them makes one a mortal enemy, worthy of any sort of attack. Nothing matters but power. The most crass partisanship is masked with lip-biting admonitions to "get along." Inconvenient revelations are greeted with hissing about a "vast right-wing conspiracy." I've had it. Tomorrow, we'll find out if the American people have had it. Vote early, but once! P. responses > /dev/null (I'm outta here!)