SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Keith Feral who wrote (4344)11/6/2000 4:57:43 PM
From: tradeyourstocks  Respond to of 196959
 
I thought I heard in the most recent CC that there were now 20 companies licensed for WCDMA. Anyone remember hearing that? Anyway, it seems to me that the only issue which remains with regard to WCDMA is the applicability of Q's newer (non IS-95) patents to this standard. I'm just speculating here, but I think that most everyone seems to agree that Q's older patents covering the most important aspects of CDMA are not being questioned. Therefore, anyone that licensed those patents for IS-95 probably feels comfortable extending those licenses for 3G. Based on some comments from Nokia IR, I think they are trying to assert that their existing license for IS-95 is also applicable for 3G since the patents are the same. I'm sure Q would like to expand that agreement to cover some newer patents and raise the licensing fees.

That's the way I read this whole thing.
MicroE