Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stomper who wrote (12013)	11/6/2000 8:04:57 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

stomp, See the following historical quotes for RMBS..... chart.yahoo.com RMBS has 'NEW' gaps from the close on 10/31 from $44 15/16 to $$47 9/16.... the low of the day on 11/1....... Another gap exists from the close on 11/1 from $48 5/8 to $50.... the low of the day on 11/2........ One more 'NEW' gap exists from the close on 11/2 from $50 5/8 to $53 7/8 ..... the low of the day on 11/3. The only way to close a gap is to have the gap filled (up or down) after it has been created. Hope that helps. BTW, I understand that some TA guys feel ALL gaps must be eventually filled..... others, like JW, think gaps are bunk.... worthless poo poo & will bitchslap you for worrying about them...... & others feel that some gaps may be left open if there is compelling news that changes the underlying fundamentals of the company....... Was the Epidia & Samsung signing to pay royalties to RMBS compelling???? Ö¿Ö