Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (18010)	11/8/2000 1:03:41 PM
From: Epinephrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mani, I was in the hospital yesterday and could not reply sooner. I don't want to reopen a closed subject but I am replying because you stated that I didn't have my facts straight and I don't think that is an accurate or fair statement. <Before posting a long rant you need to get your facts straight. Of all the posts you listed, I only saw Paul being called "pauly". That is not OK and yes I did miss it. The rest of the names such as "prengle" and "pee wee pauly" have not been used on this thread as of 2 months ago. I do not think they have been used over the past 3 months but I can't be sure.> Here are links to the other names I mentioned so that you will know that I do indeed have my facts straight. The only one that I overstated was "Pee Wee Paulie" but considering I made that post off of memory and without digging a comprehensive list of links I don't think that qualifies as my facts not being straight, it is more of a technicality and I feel my point is still valid. September 29th - Message 14481852 October 20th - Message 14629994 October 8th - Message 14536161 October 22nd - Message 14637002 August 27th - Message 14281998 <None of the one you listed even comes close to saying some one is " sniffing up the Dell Web Sites like a Dog's nose stuck in another dog's derriere.> I don't agree. That analogy is admittedly crude but I don't think that it is excessively vulgar. And the analogy is to someones behavior not to the person himself. In my opinion that is no more offensive than directly calling someone a baboon and then claiming that they are an even lower form of life. I realize that this is a matter of opinion so you may not agree but I don't think you can claim that my opinion on the subject is invalid. <The other thread is available if you don't like this one.> Mani, I do like this thread and have praised it many times, but that doesn't mean I always have to agree with you does it? If that's what it means then maybe all of the "censorship" cries were more accurate than I thought. Epinephrine