SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Southwall Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TBF who wrote (980)11/7/2000 8:55:48 AM
From: Arthur Radley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1143
 
Excuse me!
I'm being excessively negative.
Just for the record....I have MY MONEY tied up with this POS. MY MONEY might not be important to you and that is fine..but your scenario of what might happen is muted by the FACT of what is happening. Let me remind you that SWTX was already out of compliance with their lenders BEFORE this all happpened and if you want to take the rose colored glasses view of this operation and how they will keep this POS in float ....go for it. Send me a check for $75,000 dollars for my SWTX stock and I will tell you that O.J. Simpson isn't guilty and SWTX is a great company. Until then....if you want to think that SWTX HAS PAID the NASDAQ and gotten nothing in return for money that they desperately need to keep this POS running then I must admit that management of this company is more incompetent than Dan Quayle ever was. And let me point out that at first you say SWTX has paid the NASDAQ and then you say that they will survive but not as a listed NASDAQ company. Please don't tell me that they have wasted more money for a listing that will not do them any good.

TBF, I apologize for being so harsh in my reply...but just think of it in a positive way...maybe it will prevent Czech from really taking you to task over this POS.(:>)



To: TBF who wrote (980)11/8/2000 12:21:04 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1143
 
>>SWTX actually has some leverage in negotiations because there are multiple companies interested.<<

do you actually believe there is even one serious buyer? i don't. maybe there are a could companies saying... "hey, for wooden nickel..."

this management team is all smoke and mirror and no reality.

i've followed this company for years and meshing all available information has led me to this conclusion. differing opinions are welcome (and hopefully accurate, but i don't rely on hope - the hard data shows these guys to be idiots).

btw, i wonder why they hired the consultants. my guess is to fool the shareholders again.

i can't figure out why right now.