Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (3193)	11/7/2000 12:39:10 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Have fun at work Greg. I'm home with a cough. What on Earth would be the motivation to perpetuate a fraud? What other science has done this successfully. Granted our nuclear industry came close with the "Our Friend the Atom" type propaganda, but really, has mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and geology done that much to "hide" the truth? I don't think so. The opposite can't be said of dogmatic interpretations of reality. So just from a "whose laundry is dirtier" point of view, which camp has the better claim on trying to discover the truth? In my lifetime I've seen a reworking of the geological time scale, the theory of the origins of the solar system, the model of the atom, and not even to mention the practical revolution produced by the computer. All of these required a rethinking and resubmission of the facts to tests of logic. I think we are closer to the truth than we were. I'm just not seeing the conspiracy mentality that you see in science trying to intentionally to deceive us with wrong interpretations of fossil evidence.