Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lexi2004 who wrote (62331)	11/7/2000 9:00:44 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Think you have it right ....Hilliary wins NY Senate seat.

To: lexi2004 who wrote (62331)	11/7/2000 9:57:05 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

>>>I think maybe some supporters of Nader realized a vote for Nader was actually a vote that would help Bush.<<< No question about it. When Bush's DUI thing became an issue, both the Undecided and Nader-leaning voters saw the cover-up to what Bush did and how he covered over the incident. That he got busted and convicted for DUI didn't mean beans to but a very few voteres. But what did mean beans was when the undecideds and Nader-leaning voters realized Bush literally used his voting-aged twins as the excuse for not telling the American people about the DUI. Heck, the voting-age twins, as voters, had a right to know about the DUI. I think this, deep down, led the two important groups of voters to come in solidly behind Al Gore, precisely because they didn't want to see a president who'd so easily use 'cover-up' as strategy. However, as I write this, CNN just moved Florida back into the "Too Close to Call" category. Will it be I whose eating crow--LOL? Regardless, my point above is worthy of consideration and should be well-taken.