Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (116151)	11/8/2000 1:33:14 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I am continually amazed how you, an apparently intelligent person, cannot understand how well informed and intelligent people could make the rational choice of voting for GW Bush, and for good reasons. Instead, for some reason you reduce the opposition to the lowest common denominator, refusing to respect the very good, logical reasons they have for differing with you. In my experience, it is much more effective to respect your competition. When making a trade on the stock market, it is best understand why an intelligent, rational person would take the other side of the trade. Similarly, in an election, it is best (IMO, of course) to understand why the most rational and intelligent of your competitors is making their choice. It does not appear as though you have made this choice, and that renders your arguments much more partisan and less logical.

To: Scumbria who wrote (116151)	11/8/2000 1:37:23 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 186894

So whenever one party is a sore loser we should overturn the election? Hogwash.