Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (127623)	11/8/2000 2:42:32 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570242

Ted, When you first read it, it sounds like MSNBC's comments are correct....but when you look further, its not true that 50% would vote for Bush. Think about it.........it does not make sense. These people are liberal liberals....do you think they would vote for Bush if they didn't vote for Nader?!! I don't think so. The story I am talking about was not in print. It was on TV. As far as Nader voters being very liberal, I think there is more to this. I have a feeling that many well meaning people cease all rational thinking when the question of environment comes up - similar to abortion (for or against). It becomes the only issue. If you remove this 1 issue, they go back to semi-rational state. This is why I think many Nader supporters are not really Nader agenda supporters, but people who are just hypnotized by the environmental issue. I think the people who are not in trance about the environment already left Nader and voted for Gore. Joe