Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (127631)	11/8/2000 3:22:44 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570331

I re-read your post, but it is still not clear one way or another. Of people who showed up and voted for Gore 50% would have voted for Gore 50% for Bush if those were the only choices (in Florida) 33% would have stayed home if Nader was not on the ballot. How do you draw any conclusion from this as far as who would have benefited? The data doesn't say if voters who would have switched to Gore or Bush voters would have stayed home. Joe I am not going to go round and round over this issue..you are wrong, 50% would not vote for Bush....trust me. ted