Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tekboy who wrote (7768)	11/8/2000 4:22:31 PM
From: areokat	Respond to of 22706

>>c) there's no evidence whatsoever that Gore's campaign had anything to do with the revelation.<< Of course not. Ya right. cak@Ikeeptellingmyselftoshutup.gov

To: tekboy who wrote (7768)	11/8/2000 4:29:13 PM
From: Another John	Respond to of 22706

Result: theonion.com john@bushorgore.com

To: tekboy who wrote (7768)	11/8/2000 4:33:47 PM
From: Apollo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22706

I see no mention of the potential influence of having St. Louis urbanites likely to vote for Gore, allowed to vote past the time when the polls should have been closed. >>>that's because Bush still took Missouri. If the outcome had gone the other way, you can bet the Republicans would be challenging it.<<< I know. But you neglect to mention that the Republicans lost the Missouri Senate race.........to a dead man. Boy, what must that say about the incumbent? Almost as crazy as voting an Arkansan woman to be a senator in a state about which she knows little, and is not honestly connected. Of course, honesty has not been an imperative with certain people anyway. All I can say is, some people benefit from incredible strokes of luck, at times. ca