Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (116220)	11/8/2000 5:46:04 PM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

A local politician (I believe Republican) in the county said that Buchanon got 2700 votes against him in an earlier election so he didn't see the present count for Buchanon as unusual. This should be easy to verify.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (116220)	11/8/2000 6:55:20 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Respond to of 186894

OTOH, The sample ballot was mailed to every registered voter, put in the paper one month prior and was on the wall at the polls...and people could ask for another ballot if they wanted if they thought they voted wrong. The sample ballot had distinct arrows pointing to the punch hole that corresponded to the candidate(s) of choice. Anyone who could not figure it out is an idiot. It is, in my opinion, not contestable. If the democrats contest this, I'm afraid there will be no end to what else is claimed. The country doesn't need this. Let there be an accurate recount (using any resource necessary to guarantee this) as mandated by Fla law and then declare a winner. To attempt to circumvent current election law at this point would corrupt the process beyond repair. THE WATSONYOUTH