SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: willcousa who wrote (39272)11/8/2000 6:08:40 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
I agree. Buchanan for all of FL was only .1% of the vote. I do not know what it was district by district but by allowing people to get a second chance to vote is a slippery slope. Where does it end? How many other counties in the country had some people making bad decisions? Can all of these people challenge their initial vote? Also, the picture today is althogether different in that anyone who supported Nader yesterday can see the outcome and change their vote. Also, how many people will be out of state(travel etc) because they had not planned on a new vote? This road simply cannot be taken for a fair election to take place.

BK



To: willcousa who wrote (39272)11/8/2000 6:15:09 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
The ballot doesn't look confusing to me:

rushlimbaugh.com