Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (1190)	11/8/2000 7:16:31 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

Who's to say that Gore gets his votes anyway. You are kidding aren't you? Who do you think would have gotten Nader's votes? Barney the Dinosaur? Ideologically, Nader is a lot closer to Gore than Bush. And besides, all Gore would have needed was fewer than 3% of the Nader vote. Exit polling of Nader voters clearly indicated that a chunk of them would have gone with Gore had Nader not been on the ballot. Besides, what does Perot in '92 have to do with Nader in '00. In '92, Perot was a populist with a theme similar to Clinton's. The Perot of '00 would have cost GW but not the one of '92. TG