SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Windsock who wrote (116339)11/8/2000 11:47:03 PM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Winsock, Re: The actions of implementing "keep the women in their place", as expressed by by stating the belief in the workplace - and acting on it - that "women belong at home" is the illegal act

This is scary, not any better than where I was born :-(

gary



To: Windsock who wrote (116339)11/9/2000 12:01:45 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "You are merely "being an a$$hole" and playing word games. The actions of implementing "keep the women in their place", as expressed by by stating the belief in the workplace - and acting on it - that "women belong at home" is the illegal act"

If you can't understand the difference between thoughts and actions, then I suggest you are the a$$hole. In fact, even if you can tell the difference you are still an a$$hole for being so rude.

Furthermore, expressing a belief is protected speech and cannot be illegal, in and of itself, unless someone has repealed the first amendment while I wasn't looking. An employer may forbid the expression of a belief, but that is not a matter of law, only company policy. Unless there is evidence that action is taken to impose that belief, such as a pattern of denying employment or advancement, or harrassment, then no crime has been committed. Despite the efforts of the liberal left, as yet thoughts are not illegal. I clearly pointed out that the belief itself was not illegal as the previous poster specifically claimed. You ignored that. Try and understand the distinction.

EP