Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MeDroogies who wrote (86455)	11/9/2000 8:39:56 AM
From: profile_14	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

MeDroogies, I agree wholeheartedly, and look at what Ashcroft of Mo. did, despite having all of the rope to take his position to the courts. This should never become a food fight.

To: MeDroogies who wrote (86455)	11/9/2000 8:51:31 AM
From: Bosco	Respond to of 97611

<edited><ot>Hi MeDroogies, the only difference is that the current Rep is running on some sort of an integrity platform. Unlike Sr, who was willing to win at nearly any cost, Jr said he wants to bring morality back to the Capitol. You can't have selective morality and integrity. The late President Nixon and President JFK have never made this issue larger than life, even if it was assumed. So, the same question can be addressed to both sides, how far are they ready to go to move into the WH. Already, VP Gore seems to suggest he would not challenge the split between popularity and electorial votes. Btw, here is the latest courtesy of Bloomberg quote.bloomberg.com <edited postscript> evidently, some of us here are fed up with this, so I shall listen to the collective will <vbg> and stop making further comment best, Bosco