SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (7476)11/9/2000 9:40:19 AM
From: Mark Johnson  Respond to of 30051
 
mishedlo: Valence owns the premier rights to Li/Poly Technology.......Worldwide baby.....

This is really something......



To: mishedlo who wrote (7476)11/9/2000 9:51:45 AM
From: Rashomon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Mishedlo: This is from memory, I haven't dug out analyst reports. The potential market for li-polymer batteries for portable devices was projected to be on the order of $5 billion by 2002 or so. The important thing was the growth rate, which if I remember correctly was compounding at about 30 percent annually. However, that's the market for rechargeable batteries, not necessarily li-poly. Holy CEO Dawson claims that li-poly as implemented by the V company has cost advantages over competing non-poly lithium designs, and it certainly can have packaging advantages in batteries about 4mm thick covering large surface areas. Expanding market share in a rapidly growing market could lead to huge growth rates for VLNC -- if they execute. VLNC still needs to get some large POs and ramp production to start proving these points, but the IP agreement today seems very bullish, particularly that Telecordia was willing to take VLNC stock in exchange for the IP rights. Hopefully it is restricted from selling that stock in any form for some period, but we'll find that out at the conference call today.



To: mishedlo who wrote (7476)11/9/2000 9:52:44 AM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Well I never understood why anybody would want to license VLNC's technology when they in turn license the technology from Telcordia. At least if someone want to license the technology, now they only have to go to one place. Question is whether anyone wants to license it since nobody has made it profitable as yet.