Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ex-INTCfan who wrote (13264)	11/9/2000 12:05:32 PM
From: jmac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

I sort of agree with you and they do know who voted in the first place. The registry of eligible voters is a document that could be used to make sure that no new voters could vote. But, I believe that would be unconstitutional. So, the judge has only 3 options: 1. Do nothing and declare the rsults the results; 2. Void those ballots marketed for Buchanan and keep the other 19000 ballots with double punchmarks out. 3. order a new county-wide election for president. Depending on what rememdy he thinks he would chose, he will either dismiss the suit or hold an evidentiary hearing. If he thinks he might chose #1 or #2 only, then there is no need for an evidentiary hearing. If #3 is a possibility, he will order an evidentiary hearing to be held within days.