Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Sikora who wrote (39337)	11/9/2000 12:20:22 PM
From: daryll40	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

I realize this is a frivolous answer and not a logical response, but here goes for the fun of it: Those seniors sure know how to work the B-I-N-G-O cards without a problem. Daryll40

To: John Sikora who wrote (39337)	11/9/2000 1:46:51 PM
From: Lone Star	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Bad guess, the vote is over and if the brain-addled couldn't find the candidate they wanted too bad. The ballot in question has been used in prior elections, was sanctioned by all governing bodies, and headed by a Democrat.

To: John Sikora who wrote (39337)	11/9/2000 2:11:17 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 70976

OT How do you explain away the fact that Buchanan got 3407 in a democratic It is not up to the media, you, nor I to interpret why people vote the way they do. FWIW, On FoxNews, it was reported that Buchanan received ~8000 votes in the same district in '96. Apparently, he has a relative there. As far as a revote goes, can the Reps have a revote in districts in close states they lost? Where does it end? This is a slippery slope and a road we do not to wish to travel, or our democracy will forever be weakened. BK