Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert O who wrote (39343)	11/9/2000 12:47:21 PM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

OT End of story - NOT (says a Federal Judge) News item - Federal judge calls hearing in Florida vote controversy (http://www.cnn.com/). Clearly, there are extremely reasonable, and probably better qualified, people who disagree with you Robert. I'm afraid in this singular circumstance your claims are likely to be proven wrong. We're dealing with highly irregular voting patterns and a unique voting population. It's one thing to claim 'ALL parties' approved the ballot; it's altogether different to realize in hindsight how incredibly inappropriate it may have been for an elderly population. An 'End of Story' assertion leaves no room for human misjudgment...and misjudgement is probably a fairly accurate way to characterize this ballot situation.

To: Robert O who wrote (39343)	11/9/2000 1:08:12 PM
From: Sam Citron	Respond to of 70976

Robert, Your brief is also well presented. Can you imagine any hypothetical where a revote would be justified absent outright fraud? If you examine the demographics of Palm Beach County, you will find quite a large proportion of elderly voters. Elderly people frequently have significant enough vision-related problems that something only slightly unusual for the rest of us is absolutely impossible for the elderly to decipher. Those who approved the butterfly punchcard ballot in Palm Beach obviously have no regard for the common difficulties of a substantial portion of the population in their jurisdiction. I agree that the punchcard system has to go. If the voter has made more choices than permissible, the system must so inform the voter so that he can reconsider. The visual display of information is also unbelievably important. In the future, I would hope that ballots will be approved by experts in graphics as well as party operatives.