Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nichols who wrote (65882)	11/9/2000 12:47:08 PM
From: moby_dick	Respond to of 769667

...or the guy who asked us to read his lips? C'mon all politicians are guilty - try not to be one-sided.

To: Nichols who wrote (65882)	11/9/2000 1:01:16 PM
From: Timothy W. Johnson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Nichols In answer to your question, Gore is the liar, but I'm sure you know this. Anyway - Just to go over the issues with you again... I, like your friend Clinton, am not sure what your definition of "is" is, but Bush is for "Affirmative Access". I, however, am against Affirmative Action, just so you know. People should advance on the merits of their abilities. Now, about the Hate Crime Law - Bush is against putting more laws on the books than are necessary (do you see this theme of smaller government working?) Murder is Murder. What harsher punishment would you like to recommend be covered under the Hate Crimes Law. When did Bush lie about his drinking arrest? It is you that should be giving me a break, on this there will be no debate.

To: Nichols who wrote (65882)	11/9/2000 1:30:08 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Nope - the one who lied about the Buddhist temple being fund raiser... the one who lied (under oath) about his fund raising activities on federal property... the one who invented the internet... Just love when people like you, Wexler, and Chaka Fatah tell us all the score... Would be worth a good laugh until the tragic realization that most of you "SOCIALPATHS" actually convince yourselves that it's reality... Are you guilty about the money you have or are you looking to get the government to give you someone else's?

To: Nichols who wrote (65882)	11/9/2000 2:42:16 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769667

Do you believe the penalty should have been different for the James Byrd case if Byrd was white? When you say "The guy who can't say he's against Hate Crime law?" it indicates to me that you do. I think Bush's position is that a crime like this is a hate crime whether the victim is white, black, jewish, gay, straight, etc., etc., etc. He also indicated that its hard to punish anyone more than put them to death. This sounds like logic to me, but you see it some other way. Also, when 2 of the 3 people are sentenced to die, and in the heat of a debate he says 3 instead of 2, I don't think he is trying to fool anybody. I think he made a mistake. I don't truly believe that you honestly think he was lieing, but it sounds good to you so you go with it. A good example of a lie is when you raise money, and then say you didn't know what you are doing.