Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (65969)	11/9/2000 1:15:01 PM
From: microhoogle!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

But that has not created a crisis like this one. The margin was enough to ignore the results of one poll booth in Iowa.

To: SecularBull who wrote (65969)	11/9/2000 1:17:22 PM
From: Ex-INTCfan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

LoF, if that is the case, you revote that portion of Iowa.

To: SecularBull who wrote (65969)	11/9/2000 1:20:10 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

>>>>A poll booth malfunctioned in Iowa and all votes were lost. How do we correct that?<<<< I don't know about where you vote but where I voted I signed my name and they gave me a ballot and a slip of paper with a number on it. The way to correct the problem in Iowa would be to allow the people whose votes were lost to vote again. I think they should do this only if there is a reasonable chance that it would affect the results. Would you say there is a reasonable chance it would affect the results in Florida. If an error that is correctable happened then why wouldn't everyone want it to be corrected? When 19,000 votes in one precinct are thrown out something is wrong.