Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ericneu who wrote (116463)	11/9/2000 2:26:07 PM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

We had the same type ballot throughout the Chicago area. No one has complained to my knowlege. Just heard that roughly the same number of votes were invalid in the 96 election in Palm Beach County so this year's statistic does not appear unusual if that report was true. I am suspicious of people who put forth statistics to make a partisan point and don't give you the past experience to go with it.

To: ericneu who wrote (116463)	11/9/2000 3:10:57 PM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 186894

RE: "No one seemed to have a problem with the ballot until it became clear that Florida could possibly determine who our next President would be. That strikes me as disingenuous at best." Hi Eric, I believe some voters of all Parties had a couple of problems with this at some point. Maybe at the last election, the Democrats were listed first. The issue is that they are taking issue with this ballot now, when they should have taken issue with it before the election. Regards, Amy J