SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (116469)11/9/2000 2:36:52 PM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Even though I would disagree with the concept of a revote, it would be pretty easy to restrict a revote to only the people that voted Tuesday, making it a lot more fair.

That said, given that A) Daly said that Gore wouldn't concede even if he lost the recount and B) the recount is pretty darn close to final at +1,663 for Bush, it appears that a revote is a possibility.



To: Amy J who wrote (116469)11/12/2000 4:33:21 AM
From: nihil  Respond to of 186894
 
If there is a revolt anywhere, I think only a national revolt would be fair. This is the situation that the 2d Amendment was meant to deal with. We are all armed, and must be assumed to be dangerous.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News