Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (66424)	11/9/2000 3:44:55 PM
From: microhoogle!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

BTW: If it is designed by a democrat does not imply that it is correct. Both party representatives have to approve it. So the mistake is both of Dems and Reps

To: jlallen who wrote (66424)	11/9/2000 3:45:25 PM
From: amadeus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

apparently there is a law requiring the punch hole to be to the right of each candidate, to avoid this kind of confusion. what i heard on cnn anyway.

To: jlallen who wrote (66424)	11/9/2000 7:37:41 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769667

>>>No way. The ballot was completely legal. In fact, designed by a Dem, published and mailed in advance. Too late to contest now. JLA<<< Please explain to me why you think the ballot was legal. Please cite an update copy of Florida election law relative to ballot placement. Are you saying it isn't true that the punch-hole legally had to be to the right of the candidate's name? Regarding the sample, what was previewed prior to Tuesday's voting was a sample ballot not including the punch-holes and one which had not withstood the scrutiny of Tuesday voters.