SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jmac who wrote (13514)11/9/2000 4:05:51 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
is that true,

Greg



To: jmac who wrote (13514)11/9/2000 4:07:30 PM
From: Ex-INTCfan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
If that is true, that would be good. eom



To: jmac who wrote (13514)11/9/2000 4:34:28 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
wrong jmac,

Iowa may be a recount solely due to the laws of the state of Iowa & the fact the vote may end up within those legal limits.... if not.... no recount

The Republicans did not state they want a recount in NM.... they said there was one large district that has not yet been counted & they conceded it may not tip NM to Bush.

Please try to report your info accurately..... BTW, what was your source of that misinformation?

Ö¿Ö


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News