Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (35231)	11/9/2000 5:13:21 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

If Bush wins tonight, he will surely win the absentee count. BUT, FLorida law favors Gore. That said, Gore will not be well-received if he litigates the hell out of this. What irony-- A Daley complaining about election irregularities!

To: Paul Shread who wrote (35231)	11/9/2000 5:18:07 PM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Paul, >>>> This sucks, frankly. It's no way to elect a president <<<< Couldnt have said it better. If I recall my history correctly, the electorial vote system was created in order to facilitate the election process in light of the fastest method of communication at the time was by horse. If I am correct about that, someone should tell our government that the communication process has improved a little since then. gggggggggggg I wonder if anyone knows how much it costs to hold the actual election/counting process. I remember years ago when I was in high school I worked for a moving company and we had to deliver those darn election machines. The costs must be still huge and probably still very wasteful. We do have the internet now. gggggg seeya