Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Triffin who wrote (1383)	11/9/2000 6:07:19 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 6710

I believe you have a point. Reno has rejected the issue...says it is totally a state issue, I agree. Meanwhile, Repubs want networks to withdraw their call on CA since so many absentee ballots out, also investigating WA and IA and WI and IL. Democrats want a check in NH. I guess MA, DC, MD and the Rocky Mountain States are the only ones that won't get reviewed. This one may not be going away any time soon. TG

To: Triffin who wrote (1383)	11/9/2000 6:13:33 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

Check this out. Someone asked the Secy of State of FL the following: " On Sept 7, you sent a memo outlining the specific guidelines for placing candidates names on the ballot. Did Palm Beach county's ballot satisfy that guideline?" Another person on the election commission paused, and then said, "I have not reviewed that ballot" ..then he said he couldn't comment further. Give me a friggin break, half the GD world has seen that ballot and this clown says he hasn't reviewed it? It's definitely litigation time folks.