SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jtech who wrote (35059)11/9/2000 7:42:42 PM
From: Lost in New York  Respond to of 50167
 
To receive the majority vote and lose the election is something a democratic society should not tolerate.

You assume that the turn out would have been the same in a purely popular election.

I know there are Bush supporters from New York and California that don't bother voting because their votes don't count, even in a close election like this one. These people might vote in a popular election. Who knows. The election was close in popular terms. There's no predicting what would have happened in a popular election.

Your assertion that the popular vote in an EC election represents the outcome of a popular style election is invalid.

IMHO



To: jtech who wrote (35059)11/9/2000 7:58:02 PM
From: edward miller  Respond to of 50167
 
No. You do not understand the law.

The election process is NOT a direct election by popular
vote. That is written in the Constitution. The electoral
college is the law.

This looks very much to me like electoral tampering, and
I did not vote for Bush. I voted for Nader in protest
of the both major parties inability to field what I feel
are top quality candidates.

All this complaining is simply My man did not win the
process so we need to change the rules - AFTER THE FACT.

This "thinking" must not be allowed to become the norm for
the US or we are finished. The people in power will have
no difficulty coming up with excuses for changing the rules.

This is exactly how dictators gain control in the so-called
Banana Republics of the world. The Democrats are turning
this into a Constitutional crisis that can have serious
implications beyond what you can imagine.