SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (67360)11/9/2000 9:48:49 PM
From: voyagers_stocktips  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Not so fast, fyi ... New Mexico has now been pulled and is now in the Undecided states section again. Plus, I've heard that Bush has been pulling ahead in the Popular vote as some remaining ballots, Absentee ballots and such, continue to be counted across the country.

Check it out (about New Mexico that is):

cache.voter.com

Oregon, New Mexico Presidential Races Undecided
November 09, 2000

BRAD CAIN
Associated Press Writer

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Even as all eyes remained on Florida, ballot counters in Oregon and New Mexico were also working to establish which presidential candidate won in their states.

Vice President Al Gore held a slender lead over Texas Gov. George W. Bush in both states with counting unfinished, but victories for either candidate would be largely symbolic because the states together have only a dozen electoral votes.

Bush needs 24 electoral votes to reach the required 270, and Gore needs 15, so neither Oregon, with 7 votes, or New Mexico, with 5, would decide the outcome. Whoever wins Florida's 25 votes will move into the White House next January.

Because of a last-minute rush of ballots, final unofficial results in Oregon's nationally unique all-mail vote won't be available until late Thursday, at the earliest. In New Mexico, the problem was technical glitches.

With 96 percent of the vote counted in Oregon, Gore had 662,155 votes, or 47 percent, to Bush's 658,123 votes, also 47 percent. Green Party contender Ralph Nader, viewed as a spoiler to Gore's chances of winning Oregon, drew 63,284 votes, or 5 percent.

Bush could take the lead in Oregon on Thursday as more votes were reported from the conservative, southwestern counties of Jackson and Josephine.

Under Oregon law, a recount would be automatic if the margin between Bush and Gore were less than one-fifth of 1 percent, or about 2,500 votes.

New Mexico was waiting for a recount of 67,000 absentee and early-voting ballots from the state's most populous county before it could declare a winner. Officials in Bernalillo County, which includes Albuquerque, began that recount Thursday morning.

With 99 percent of the precincts reporting before the recount began, Gore had 255,597 votes, or 49 percent, and Bush had 245,526, or 47 percent. Nader won 19,215 votes, or 4 percent.

The recount was caused by a software glitch and by ballots that would not go through the counting machines, officials said. The machines could not read ballots in which voters marked that they were voting a straight party ticket, but then chose at least one candidate from another party, election officials said.

The county clerk, a judge, attorneys from the Republican, Democratic and Green parties and officials of the company that manufactured the county's ballot machines agreed to the recount Wednesday afternoon, avoiding any immediate legal action.


cache.voter.com



To: PartyTime who wrote (67360)11/9/2000 10:08:03 PM
From: coug  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
Partytime,

What the Hell are all these people afraid of going to court to settle something as important as a presidential election.. Will they settle for a tainted election over the truth ?.... Aren't we seeking the truth??

It might cause a slight constitutional crisis,, but maybe in the process, a lot of good will come out of it... It would be pretty mild compared to what might have happened 200+ years when Thomas Jeffersen suggested our deomocracy should be shaken up every 20 years.. We have some catching up to do.. by PEACEFUL means..the Courts..

But as I have thought for a long time,, most of these vocal patriots and strong constitutionalists would be Tories when our country was founded.. afraid of change..

So what would it disrupt, not much.. The market.. some..

Being a financial site I will discuss the market a little.. A trader worth is salt should have went to the sidelines before this election or anytime of uncertainity... And if not.. get out and not force trades through the last couple of days..as I have read people are doing..and then complaining about getting this most important issue behind us.. Gloss it over.. Well IMO, the health of the democracy is worth one helluva lot more than a blip in the market..

In closing, let's not blow this opportunity, to re-examine our ourselves, and not be afraid to make necessary changes as we enter this new century..

Here's to the TRUTH.. c



To: PartyTime who wrote (67360)11/9/2000 10:25:26 PM
From: 91fxrs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
PT, I will support whoever is the final victor in this
election because I am an AMERICAN first. Regarding the
debacle in PB, I would feel the same way the Dems do if it
would have happened to Bush , but the rule of law will
prevail.

We shall see..