SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 91fxrs who wrote (67829)11/10/2000 2:54:05 AM
From: asenna1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Yes. If the courts say the ballots are legal and/or the voters have no right to a re-vote, then the vote should stand as is. I would not want to see this goes past that point.



To: 91fxrs who wrote (67829)11/10/2000 3:00:12 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
There should never be second a vote taken after the results have been in. If you can't fill out a ballot and follow a simple arrow, you should still be allowed to vote. However, you cannot say that a person of of such ability or any other may vote until they get the results that either they or their masters are pleased with.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News