SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (127958)11/10/2000 6:24:26 AM
From: stribe30  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571352
 
Josef said: "Where do you see a provision about a re-vote on a different date?"

IS there anything in your Constitution that says there CANT be a revote due to certain conditions? Just because it isnt in there doesnt mean it isnt allowed to happen, unless theres a specific line that says no revotes.. without that.. I believe a case can be made for it.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (127958)11/10/2000 9:49:14 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571352
 
Joe,

The Constitution specifies that everyone gets an equal vote. If the case can be made that certain people were denied the opportunity to cast their vote, is it not the obligation of the courts to provide remedy?

Scumbria



To: Joe NYC who wrote (127958)11/10/2000 11:18:32 AM
From: david_langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571352
 
Joe,

The constitution specifies a day when the presidential elections should be held. Something about the Tuesday after the first Monday of the month of November. Why do you think the framers went to this level of specificity?

The constitution is a document that should be subject to modern interpretation. Right? Only a Republican would allow himself to adhere to a strict constructionist view. After all why should we be bound by an old piece of paper written by some evil, rich, white, landowners in the 18th century.

Geez, get with the program Joe. The new constitution is now a Burger King document. Step up to the Supreme Court and "have it your way". I would like an Abortion Rights Whopper liberally smeared with Hollywood Smut and Violence Sauce, but hold the property rights pickles and the handgun buns because they upset my delicate sensibilities.

Dave

Edit: Oooops I see Scumbria and Stribe have already weighed in with similar arguments.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (127958)11/10/2000 11:39:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571352
 
The constitution specifies a day when the presidential elections should be held. Something about the Tuesday after the first Monday of the month of November.

Joe,

The constitution also requires an honest vote count. Why does one provision weigh more heavily than the other?

ted