Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Angels of Alchemy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (19795)	11/10/2000 7:11:29 AM
From: Wes Stevens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24256

Max there is a big difference between a recount and a re-vote. I am all for any recounts, buy hand or machine. What should not happen is just a re-vote for palm beach county. There are a lot of processes in place to keep the voting fair. Maybe they did not work as well as they should. But to re-vote palm beach county at this time would amount to palm beach county alone picking the president of the us. Even a re-vote of the entire state is not the solution - although better then just one county. There are many things about our election process that are not as good as they should be. We should go out and fix them. Put you cannot throw away the results because someone does not like the way the process worked out. We should go forward and fix what is wrong. To try and change election results is monkeying with the heart of our constitution.