Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eddie r gammon who wrote (36037)	11/10/2000 9:21:03 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

One of the few laws that actually make sense. Just think what would happen once you had a re-vote. Say you only did it for a tie -- then somebody would want it for a virtual tie and the margin would work itself up from there -- I see wisdom in that ...

To: eddie r gammon who wrote (36037)	11/10/2000 9:30:14 AM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

that's what i thought...the chances of the legal challenge succeeding are slim. furthermore, the retropublicans are now demanding re-counts in other states where the race was close, and that might decide things anyway. all that said, the Robot's decision to mount a legal challenge is like opening a can of worms - the question is, where will it end? for instance, the predominantly republican Fla. panhandle has a bunch of irate republican voters now, because their polling stations closed an hour later due to being in a different time zone, and when the networks initially gave Fla. to the Robot, they went home instead of voting.