Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (1521)	11/10/2000 10:29:24 AM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

For those who may have missed my 3am post last night, a repost: "The House and Senate get involved only if there is no candidate with 270 electoral votes. With the recent election, 27 state delegations of the House of Representatives are now controlled by Republicans. Therefore, the House will definitely be able to elect a President and of course that President will be Bush...if the House gets involved. But a new wrinkle has entered the fold: If this case is NOT settled by January 6, then no candidate will have 270 electoral votes, as the case will be in the courts. Constitutional law question: Can the House then turn around and elect the President of the United States while the electoral vote issue is in the courts? If the House can exercise that vote, then it is in the best interests of Bush to keep this case tied up in court as long as possible. Of course, if the court case overrides the power of the House, then all bets are off. But who knows which body has overriding power, the Congress or the court case. The Constitution is the law of the land and should rule, if no one has 270 elec votes by Jan. 6, 2001, but what about pending legal actions to determine the FL winner? The Supreme Court will definitely get involved in this one."