Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Liatris Spicata who wrote (14145)	11/10/2000 10:22:38 AM
From: sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

OFF TOPIC "They had every opportunity to review the ballot ahead of time." In all fairness, it should be pointed out that the ballot instructions sent to the public specifically said to mark the hole 'to the right of the candidate's name.' Some can arguable claim they actually did follow the instructions. They marked the second hole. That's the hole that -- legally -- should have corresponded to a vote for Al Gore. That's the problem. That's why the ballot should never have been used. That's the reason the Democrats have every right to be bitter. That said, ultimately its a moot issue -- George W. Bush will be the next President of the United States.