SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Culver who wrote (594)11/10/2000 11:35:04 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11633
 
Nice that energy prices are holding up.... anyone know about MXT's hedges... when they start rolling over cash flow will fly.

DAK



To: David Culver who wrote (594)11/10/2000 11:49:52 AM
From: Lorne Larson  Respond to of 11633
 
I expect more details will be forthcoming. For example they indicate funds from operations of about 4.4 million, but indicate about 3.8 applied to debt. I assume the difference is related to capital expenditures of some sort.

On the whole the statements look pretty good to me. The concerns I had were related to production and capex and these do not appear to be a problem. Based on debt of 19 million at the end of Q3, and assuming nothing has changed respecting their operations during Oct-Nov, they should have debt of about 16.5 million by the end of November. Cash flow at that time should be 16-17 million/annum. There formula for reinstating dividends was a debt/cash-flow of 1:1, so, as they put it in todays release, their target of Jan 15/2001 for a 1st payment is "well within our reach."



To: David Culver who wrote (594)11/10/2000 1:14:44 PM
From: Scott Mc  Respond to of 11633
 
I liked that the O/P was greater than 2Q, 2222 vrs 2137, shows that they were able to quickly bring production back, asssuming they could only start after the new loan was arranged (Mid-Aug), the current production is probably 5% greater than 2222 right now, Scott



To: David Culver who wrote (594)11/14/2000 8:57:47 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11633
 
Time to revisit the gas producers with this move in NG??? Shiningbank is one of my largest holdings... any others?

DAK