Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (36109)	11/10/2000 10:45:15 AM
From: Terry Whitman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I wasn't alive in 1960, but I know he fought it for quite a few weeks before 'gracefully bowing out'. <g> Quite a few people felt cheated then, and quite a few will feel cheated now. They could be right. It's beyond me to judge it one way or the other. It won't change the outcome, however.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (36109)	11/10/2000 10:46:06 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<Nixon had good reason in '60. he was actually urged by his campaign people to press the matter further, as there were pretty clear indications of fraud...he then decided to bow out "for the good of the country" in spite of the chance of possibly successfully challenging the results. obviously this was before he embarked on becoming a crook... >> I believe that there may have been another reason.. it is widely believed that there was voter fraud on both sides... republicans downstate as well. I think he would have been claiming Daley cheated more [no doubt]. DAK