Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (127974)	11/10/2000 11:01:04 AM
From: Cirruslvr	Respond to of 1571399

Scumbria - RE: "There is pretty strong evidence that the PB ballots violated Florida State laws." Which laws were violated? I am under the impression the ballot was legal. "What kind of precedent would it be to not redo the election, given that the vote has become so critical?" I'll answer your question even though you didn't answer either of mine... Assuming there is no fraud and the PB ballots didn't violate Florida Laws, not redoing the election would set the precedent that the each vote matters, that people should be extra careful when they look over the ballot and decide who to vote for. It would reinforce that votes are meant to happen once, not over and over again because some people aren't able to vote correctly. It would say if one votes wrong its their fault, not the systems.