SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (1526)11/10/2000 11:02:31 AM
From: TraderGreg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
The twists and turns of this entire situation are mind numbing. Then there are all the side bars:

If FL is litigated, then the Repubs will challenge in NM, IA, and WI, while the Dems will challenge in NH.

And others if I missed some close states.

The issue of whether the House can vote for a President while the electoral votes are still in dispute is another problem entirely. The Supreme Court may review the details of the 1876 election to see the time parameters there. I believe that back then, the House of Representatives appointed the Commission to resolve the electoral votes. But that could have been because no party had control of a majority of the states.

The 1876 precedent may resolve this, should neither candidate withdraw. And I stand by my belief that neither candidate should withdraw.

No one ever said democracy was easy. It goes for the right fix, not the quick fix.

TG