Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chomolungma who wrote (1530)	11/10/2000 12:04:13 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

As I have stated on that matter a number of times. Both sides would have to show there is a legal precedent for their concern. RE: the early call in FL before the CST zone polls closed. Since 1980, the networks agreed to not call a state till the polls closed...they "agreed". To my knowledge, there is no law requiring it. If they can find a LEGAL precedent, then the Repubs should pursue the matter. RE: the complaints about the ballot. If the Gore people can show the ballot is in violation of FL statute or case law precedents, then they too should pursue the matter. If both concerns are valid, then perhaps a re-vote in Palm Beach County AND western Florida counties could be a reasonable compromise solution. TG