Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (14106)	11/10/2000 1:32:44 PM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 65232

I agree, that's the "glitch" they're talking about, and Gore/Daley is going to do everything they can to "correct it." They just have to keep counting. The Daley machine from Chicago reputedly has a long history of that kind of thing.

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (14106)	11/10/2000 1:48:14 PM
From: im a survivor	Respond to of 65232

<<2 counts...can't be a "glitch" now. The only "glitch" for Gore is that Bush won.>> Yes...you know that and I know that, but we also both know that the closeness of the count coupled with the innaccurate handcount, will result in a Gore Victory. Then what ? Think about it....human error coupled with possible deceit. Even without the deceit, such a large number to be handcounted, will undoubtedly equal vastly different numbers. This is a disgrace to all americans. As an american and taxpayer, I feel very, very cheated. Keith