SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nick who wrote (14157)11/10/2000 2:16:56 PM
From: CAtechTrader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
It is stuff like this I am VERY concerned about:

MOSCOW (Agence France Presse) - Nationalists in Russia's parliament have drafted a resolution demanding the right to observe the U.S. presidential elections, voicing "profound concern" they will be falsified, Interfax reported Tuesday.

The resolution says the State Duma (lower house) has "profound concern about the danger of falsification of the results of the U.S. presidential elections, particularly in Texas and California and other territories that were forced to join the United States."

It adds that since the United States is a world superpower, "the presidential election campaign in the U.S. must not be considered an exclusive internal affair of that country."

The Duma draft, which is yet to come up for a vote, suggests the UN Security Council should confirm the November 7 presidential ballot before it can be declared valid. ((c) 2000 Agence France Presse



To: Nick who wrote (14157)11/10/2000 2:26:36 PM
From: brightness00  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Doesn't it make you feel odd that Gore ballots stick together more than Bush ballots? Half of the change 1400 or so changes come from one county (out of 67 counties), where the "unsticking" is something like 7.5-to-1 (nearly 800 vs. a little over 100), several times higher than even the total Gore-to-Bush ratio in that county. Most other counties are only reporting differences in the single digits, with a few reporting dozens, but nowhere near the upper triple digit discrepencies that is coming out of WPB, which btw has a democratic election office.

Does this not raise concern about what exactly is going on in the re-counting process? or simply statistics improbability need not get in the way of a Gore victory?



To: Nick who wrote (14157)11/10/2000 2:33:07 PM
From: Bob Pittsfield  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
The process could be endless. Just how many recounts (machine or hand) do you, (or more important, Gore people), consider adequate. 2,3,5,10 or until they win?



To: Nick who wrote (14157)11/10/2000 3:19:47 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
A hand count will be less accurate than a machine count. That's why they switched to machines. Machines don't lose track, "oh, was that 49 or 59?" right in the middle, and they aren't biased. Although, in New Mexico, it appears that one county's machines weren't set to count straight Republican ticket voters.