Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JB who wrote (53105)	11/10/2000 2:44:51 PM
From: alydar	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 74651

To Thread, Does anyone really think that 19,000+ people voted for two presidential candidates in Palm Beach County? The best thing about our democracy is that we correct our mistakes. Obviously, something went really wrong in the Palm Beach County vote. My solution is this. Palm Beach already has a registry of the people who voted. They can mandate a re-vote for only those people that actually voted, therefore, it would not be a open election. This limited election would provide a clearer representation of the "will of the people" in Palm Beach county that took the time to practice their constituional rights. I think thats what a judge will impose. Good judges do not pick sides but make decisions that are supposed to be fair for all parties. Obviously, if a "limited" re-vote takes place Bush will lose Florida but that is probably the "right" thing to do. JMO and please no personal attacks, Bob.