Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fedhead who wrote (2890)	11/10/2000 2:55:11 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57684

Each to her/his own -- I think the price levels of the companies you mention are the ones still at serious risk -- those "leaders" as you call them could yet come crashing through their 200 dma's. Those are the companies that could indeed take the averages into the mid 2000's on the Nazdaq.

To: fedhead who wrote (2890)	11/10/2000 3:32:50 PM
From: Robert Rose	Respond to of 57684

Anindo, I generally agree with this sentiment. It seems that stock by stock, sector by sector, bottoms are being established, if slowly. There may yet be a market-wide capitulation tumble. But perhaps instead the bottom takes place when the market finds a reason to trash the last glamour sector still standing, regardless of the others. As I see it, only the biotechs still stand tall.

To: fedhead who wrote (2890)	11/10/2000 4:34:54 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 57684

<<Plus a lot of leaders like ARBA, SUNW etc are at their 200 day Moving averages.>> 207.61.23.98 207.61.23.98 How's that saying go? "NEVER CATCH A FALLING KNIFE"