SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (86634)11/10/2000 5:16:42 PM
From: Richard Habib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
No, from what I understand it hasn't been done. In the machine count they just bundle the cards with no visual inspection. The reason we rarely here of the issue is that it rarely matters. In Mass, I believe, a court overturned a congressional election because the visual inspection of cards resulted in a different result. Mass subsequently passed a law outlawing punch cards. Rich



To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (86634)11/10/2000 5:18:43 PM
From: Night Writer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Duke,
The way it was announced, they will be looking for cards not punched completely. Not cards with a complete punch and a second incomplete punch. A panel of three will inspect each card while a fourth person holds it up.
NW



To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (86634)11/12/2000 12:28:05 PM
From: MeDroogies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
What if, the voter started to vote, then pulled back, deciding NOT to vote for any candidate? This may well be the intent. It is hard to not conceive this outcome, since the two are so evenly matched. I often considered only voting for the local fellows....
Intent and action are often 2 very different things....hence the problem of manipulation of these votes.