SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TraderGreg who wrote (1629)11/10/2000 8:32:11 PM
From: Carolyn  Respond to of 6710
 
There were many discussions in the paper about this. Technically the Republicans can challenge - there are several grounds - but Ashcroft chose not to.



To: TraderGreg who wrote (1629)11/10/2000 8:35:24 PM
From: Windsock  Respond to of 6710
 
You can always start a court challenge if you the $$ for a filing fee. You may not win but you can start the challenge.

In the case of Carnahan's widow the R's are asserting 2 things. First, that a dead man is not an "inhabitant" and therefore is not eligible to run for senator. Second, the statement by the governor that 'if you vote for Carnahan, I will appoint his widow' is some kind of vote buying scheme in violation of the law.

The R's in the senate are making noises that they may not seat Carnahan's widow on the grounds that they are in the majority and can do whatever they want to determine whether a newly elected senator should be seated. The moderate R's are very unlikely to allow this to happen.



To: TraderGreg who wrote (1629)11/10/2000 11:57:28 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
TG,

If he had appointed someone other than his widow, would the Republican party have had a right to challenge in court?

I don't think there is a problem with appointment of the replacement. The problem is with electing someone who is dead, I believe.

Joe